Free article: There are many ways for mobile operators to
capture voice traffic
As mobile operators develop their non-voice services, they must not
overlook the substantial opportunity to grow their voice usage and revenue
by fixed–mobile substitution. Despite high mobile penetration and the fact
that voice already dominates mobile ARPU, the majority of voice traffic in
developed markets still resides on fixed networks. The potential to grow
voice usage and ARPU is highlighted by great differences among operators,
with those in the USA achieving usage levels five (or more) times that of
those in Western Europe.
While traffic will generally continue to migrate from fixed to mobile
networks, driven by convenience, personalisation and the increasing
affordability of mobile tariffs, the extent and speed of fixed–mobile
substitution will depend heavily on the strategies adopted by fixed and
mobile operators in each country. Innovative marketing, service and pricing
strategies by mobile operators can significantly alter the split of traffic
between fixed and mobile networks.
Mobile operators are increasingly seeing fixed voice revenues as a source
of revenue growth and case studies reveal that a variety of approaches can
be successful in accelerating fixed–mobile substitution, as summarised in
Table 1.
Table 1: Case studies demonstrate a variety of
approaches to encourage fixed–mobile substitution
|
|
TIM (Italy)
|
Telefónica Móviles (Spain)
|
Sprint Nextel (USA)
|
3 (UK)
|
O2 (Germany)
|
Vodafone (Germany)
|
|
Operator strategies
|
|
Usage-enhancing prepaid services
|
● |
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
Prepaid to
contract migration
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usage-enhancing postpaid services
|
|
|
●
|
●
|
|
|
|
IMS-enhanced
voice services
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support MVNOs
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
Home zone
voice services (including provision of fixed number)
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
●
|
|
Internet
access solution (e.g. 3G Internet access or naked DSL)
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
●
|
|
Tariff approaches (voice
calls)
|
|
Prepaid
tariffs that replicate contract tariffs
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
Affordable any
time, any network minute bundles
|
|
|
●
|
●
|
|
|
|
Home zone
tariffs (similar price to fixed networks in home/workplace)
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
●
|
|
Postpaid
contracts with minimum usage commitments
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheap off-peak
calls
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
|
●
|
●
|
|
Cheap group
calls
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
|
Reducing call
charges (for greater usage)
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
Cheap on-net
calls
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
|
●
|
|
Affordable tariffs are particularly important in encouraging users to use
their mobile phones in place of fixed phones. Sprint Nextel (in the USA) has
achieved the highest mobile usage in the world with contract tariffs that
offer large bundles of voice minutes to individuals or family groups, with
attractive options for off-peak and on-net calling. In Germany, Vodafone and
O2 have adopted an alternative approach, using home zone tariffs, which
price mobile calls in the home (or workplace) at fixed levels.
Vodafone’s recent aggressive move to target fixed revenues with home zone
voice and Internet services represents a significant development for the
German market and the mobile industry in general. With its unrivalled global
presence, large customer base, strong brand and marketing resources,
Vodafone’s move may be a prelude to further initiatives in other markets.
The new report Accelerating
Fixed–Mobile Substitution: detailed operator case studies presents
examples of both mobile-only and integrated fixed–mobile operators in
Western Europe and the USA, demonstrating a variety of ways for mobile
operators to grow their mobile usage and revenue and stimulate fixed–mobile
substitution. Companies profiled in the report include 3, O2, Sprint Nextel,
Telefónica Móviles, TIM and Vodafone.