Free article: Small operators have few viable options for
mobile TV and radio broadcasting
Mobile TV and radio will increasingly be expected by consumers and will
become must-have services for mobile operators. With early movers in Western
Europe starting to offer broadcasting services, there will be strong
competitive pressures on mobile operators to respond or risk losing market
share.
Encouraged by feedback from trials, some operators may see mobile TV and
radio as a substantial new source of revenue. However, trials may not
provide sufficient information to gauge likely revenue from a fully
commercial service, in a context where competing services may also exist. A
realistic estimate of average revenue per service user for a fully
commercial mobile TV and radio service is about EUR5 per month. Therefore
the challenge for operators is to select a broadcasting technology and
network deployment strategy that achieves a satisfactory financial return
while delivering a service proposition strong enough to interest consumers.
Among mobile broadcasting technologies, the most likely candidates for
deployment in Western Europe are DAB-IP, DVB-H, T-DMB and TDtv. In
principle, there are many deployment options using these technologies but,
for small operators, very few of these will be viable. To obtain an adequate
financial return, small operators will have to share a DAB-IP or DVB-H
broadcasting network with a significant number of other parties. This is
illustrated in Figure 1, which is based on the results of financial
modelling undertaken for our recent research report
Evaluating the Options for Mobile TV
and Radio Broadcasting in Western Europe. The figure shows the average
monthly revenue per service user and the service penetration that a small
mobile operator using a shared DAB-IP or DVB-H broadcasting network would
need to have reached in 2016 in order to achieve a 15% internal rate of
return (IRR) over the ten years from 2007 to 2016. This example assumes that
the operator has a 10% market share.
Figure 1: Service penetration and average monthly
revenue per service user required by a small mobile operator to achieve a
15% IRR using a shared DAB-IP or DVB-H network

But DAB-IP has drawbacks: it is only appropriate in
the few markets where DAB has been deployed extensively and only a limited
range of DAB handsets will be available. DVB-H is more likely to achieve
significant global economies of scale and a small mobile operator can obtain
a satisfactory return by sharing a DVB-H network with a number of other
parties. However, high spectrum costs and use of L-band spectrum would
considerably increase the service take-up and revenue required to make
sharing a DVB-H network financially viable.
Operators implementing a mobile broadcasting
solution must carefully select a strategy that suits their particular size
and market.
Evaluating the Options for Mobile TV and Radio
Broadcasting in Western Europe examines various deployment
scenarios for DAB-IP, DVB-H, T-DMB and TDtv, and explains which of these
scenarios will be commercially viable for various operator types and
circumstances.